Megyn Kelly has criticized ABC’s David Muir for his attire during coverage of the Los Angeles wildfires, accusing him of “playing dress up.” The former Fox News anchor took to social media to express her disapproval of Muir’s on-scene appearance. She felt his choice of attire was overly theatrical and unnecessary for reporting on the disaster.
Kelly’s criticism sparked a debate about the appropriate attire for journalists covering natural disasters. Some supported Kelly’s view, arguing that reporters should prioritize practicality and avoid drawing attention to themselves. They felt Muir’s clothing choices seemed more focused on creating a dramatic image than on conveying information effectively.
Others defended Muir, suggesting that his attire was appropriate given the circumstances and that Kelly’s criticism was unwarranted. Supporters argued that reporters need to be adequately protected when reporting from dangerous environments. Moreover, some considered Kelly’s remarks to be a personal attack and a way to attract attention.
The controversy highlights the ongoing scrutiny faced by media figures and the intense debate surrounding the role of appearance in journalism. While some prioritize function and neutrality, others believe that visual elements can enhance storytelling and engage viewers. Ultimately, the incident raises questions about the line between informative reporting and theatrical presentation in news coverage. The discussion continues to unfold on social media, with viewers and journalists weighing in on the appropriateness of Muir’s attire and the validity of Kelly’s criticism.
